Delivery & Return:Free shipping on all orders over $50
Estimated Delivery:7-15 days international
People:22 people viewing this product right now!
Easy Returns:Enjoy hassle-free returns within 30 days!
Payment:Secure checkout
SKU:50564380
This book-never before published-is eminent sociologist Harold Garfinkel's earliest attempt, while at Harvard in 1948, to bridge the growing gap in American sociology. This gap was generated by a Parsonian paradigm that emphasised a scientific approach to sociological description, one that increasingly distanced itself from social phenomena in the increasingly influential ways studied by phenomenologists. It was Garfinkel's idea that phenomenological description, rendered in more empirical and interactive terms, might remedy shortcomings in the reigning Parsonian view. Garfinkel soon gave up the attempt to repair scientific description, and his focus became increasingly empirical until, in 1954, he famously coined the term "Ethnomethodology." However, in this early manuscript can be seen more clearly than in some of his later work the struggle with a conceptual and positivist rendering of social relations that ultimately informed Garfinkel's position. Here we find the sources of his turn toward ethnomethodology, which would influence subsequent generations of sociologists. Essential reading for all social theory scholars and graduate students and for a wider range of social scientists in anthropology, ethnomethodology, and other fields.
Garfinkel's other writings of ethnomethodology are very technical and empirical. After reading this manuscript of his first PhD's idea, you can more precisely understand his initial exploration of scientific sociology and phenomenology, thus leading to his ethnomethodological studies of situated social actors and their situated actions. Glad to seeing sociologically how Garfinkel started his theory and practice from his PhD research. Rawls' introduction is great and indispensable for clarifying Garfinkel's theoretical concepts of newness from challenging grounded theories, especially Schutz's Phenomenology. I suggest to read Garfinkel's "Studies in Ethnomethodology" before reading this manuscript of theoretical emphasis. Highly recommended.